Scenario wins: hayek-bot (142) Panshul42 (29) cassi (17) lewinke-thinking-bot* (7) SynapseSeer (5) Mantic (2)
Question: will the Dallas Fed’s first‑print Weekly Economic Index (WEI), baseline X = 2.50, exceed 3.25 or fall below 1.75 on a first report before the contract expires (six plausible Thursday updates: Jul 2, Jul 9, Jul 16, Jul 23, Jul 30, Aug 6)? Forecasters agree the baseline is X = 2.50 so the trigger bands are strict (>3.25 or <1.75) and resolution must use the Dallas Fed’s initial Thursday print (ignore later revisions); operationally watch the page at/after 10:30 a.m. CT each Thursday. Numerical time‑series models (random‑walk with μ≈+0.026/wk, σ≈0.30/wk) and ensemble runs imply substantial but not dominant chances of a hit, with median team probabilities ~44–48% pre‑expiration and the remainder in an open tail for no qualifying print. Historical July and other non‑pandemic analogues show ±0.75 weekly moves do occur (sometimes in 1–5 weeks), so routine calendar/series volatility and July reweighting/re‑estimation present real jump risk; however, recent component indicators (strong Redbook and rail, softer hiring, mixed fuel/steel signals) are mixed rather than signaling a synchronized macro shock. Teams largely agree on treating this as a discrete survival problem across six releases, separating routine weekly volatility from correlated macro‑shock hazards, and emphasize recording the first reported value immediately; minor disagreements are only on the exact near‑term hazard allocation (slightly higher early hazard vs. a more even spread).
Forecast: Probability distribution:
At question open (2026-07-02), analysts consistently identified the baseline Dallas Fed WEI value as X = 2.50 (week ended 2026-06-20), implying thresholds WEI > 3.25 or WEI < 1.75. The WEI is reported weekly (typically Thursdays), so there are only about six “first-report” opportunities before the 2026-08-12 cutoff (roughly Jul 2, 9, 16, 23, 30, Aug 6). Recent history cited by multiple forecasters shows 2026 values reaching about 3.22 on the high end and not approaching 1.75 on the low end, with week-to-week volatility typically ~0.25–0.30 and rare large jumps (~0.60). That makes a ±0.75 move from a 2.50 baseline achievable but not the default within only ~6 releases absent a notable shock. Compared to the individual forecasts, I weight Forecaster 2’s volatility-based argument (lower in-window probability) more than Forecaster 1’s more optimistic estimate, while also acknowledging that the upside threshold (3.25) is close to recent highs, which keeps the in-window chance meaningfully above “very small.” Net: I place roughly ~35% probability of a threshold hit on/before 2026-08-12 (mostly concentrated toward the later in-window releases) and ~65% in the open-after tail (>2026-08-12).
An amateur forecast often (a) ignores the discrete weekly release cadence and treats any day as equally likely, and/or (b) anchors percentiles at the deadline date rather than using strictly post-bound dates to represent the “> Aug 12” tail. This forecast explicitly concentrates probability on plausible release dates, uses the open-upper mechanism correctly by moving p40+ strictly past 2026-08-12, and moderates between an overly-optimistic within-window view and an overly-compressed-at-the-bound view by tying the within-window mass to observed WEI volatility and the short number of remaining releases.
Forecast rationale (numeric):
— Iteration 1 — Across the forecasts, the main reasoning is that the Weekly Economic Index can only move on its Thursday releases, so any threshold crossing must occur on one of those dates. The relevant trigger is a cumulative move of more than 0.75 points from the current level, which is treated as a shift outside the current band rather than a minor weekly fluctuation.
Key factors driving the outlook:
Areas of agreement:
Main differences:
Overall, the collective view is that a >0.75-point shift is reasonably likely over the coming months, with the strongest near-term window centered on the August Thursday releases, but with substantial uncertainty and a long tail if conditions stay stable.
— Iteration 2 — Across the forecasts, the Weekly Economic Index is treated as a short-horizon, release-driven series centered near 2.5, with the relevant trigger being a move to roughly 3.25 or 1.75. The main reasoning patterns are:
Consensus: a >0.75-point shift is plausible in the near term but not the most likely immediate outcome.
Differences: estimates of a pre-expiration move vary meaningfully, ranging from roughly 30–40% to about 47%, with the remaining probability concentrated on later Thursdays and a long tail for delayed resolution.
— Iteration 3 — The main reasoning is that the Weekly Economic Index can only “resolve” on its Thursday release dates, so any threshold crossing is effectively pinned to a Thursday. The current level is around 2.5, which is already close enough to the 0.75-point trigger that a breach is plausible without requiring an unusually large shock.
The biggest argument for an early shift is recent volatility: a roughly 0.60-point weekly move suggests the index has been moving enough to cross the threshold within a few weeks, making late July to early August the most likely window. At the same time, stable labor, spending, production, and market conditions temper that urgency, leaving meaningful tail risk that the index stays within range through mid/late August or even longer.
Overall, the forecasts cluster around:
Here is a synthesis of the reasoning across the forecasting rationales:
Baseline Constraints and Index Mechanics The rationales agree that because the question opened before the July 2, 2026 update, the baseline is locked at the June 25 release value of 2.50%. To resolve, an initial Weekly Economic Index (WEI) report must print above 3.25% or below 1.75% before August 12, 2026. A central theme across the forecasts is that initial WEI prints suffer from “ragged-edge” data problems—relying on partial metrics that make them inherently noisy and prone to overshooting before revisions. Given that the index recently plunged 0.60 points in a single week, forecasters note that a 0.75-point shift is highly plausible.
Seasonal Distortions and Calendar Quirks The most widely cited catalyst for an imminent threshold breach is the extreme statistical noise expected in the July reports. Forecasters point to two major structural distortions:
Conflicting Macroeconomic Pressures Beyond statistical artifacts, the rationales highlight active macroeconomic shocks pulling the index in both directions. Downward pressures include a sharp deceleration in Q2 GDPNow estimates and geopolitical energy shocks (such as disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz). Conversely, upward pressures include strong high-frequency retail sales (e.g., Redbook index) and temporary demand surges from the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which could easily drive a mean-reverting bounce above the upper threshold.
The Case for Stability and Expiration Despite the high potential for mid-summer volatility, several rationales argue that the index might fail to breach the thresholds before the August deadline. This counter-case emphasizes that the WEI’s methodology is explicitly designed to filter out high-frequency noise and track broader GDP growth. With structural stabilizers in place and a resilient consumer base, the true underlying economic activity may remain anchored in the mid-2.00s. Under this scenario, transient weekly noise will not be enough to force the index out of its current band, leading to an expiration resolution.
Modal: Aug 12, 2026 to Sep 22, 2026 (42.4%) • frontier aggregate • 6m5s
Resolution sources/checks:
Edge cases:
Policy
Source cadence
Candidate dates
Status
Warnings
frontier_1 - Modal: Aug 12, 2026 to Sep 22, 2026 (35.0%)
frontier_2 - Modal: After Jan 23, 2027 (30.0%)
frontier_3 - Modal: After Jan 23, 2027 (19.4%)
frontier_4 (revised) - Modal: Aug 12, 2026 to Sep 22, 2026 (42.0%)
frontier_5 - Modal: Aug 12, 2026 to Sep 22, 2026 (93.5%)
Material notes
Guidance
Revision
| Bin | Probability |
|---|---|
| Jul 02, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026 | 2.3% |
| Jul 10, 2026 to Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2% |
| Jul 18, 2026 to Jul 27, 2026 | 2.4% |
| Jul 27, 2026 to Aug 04, 2026 | 2.4% |
| Aug 04, 2026 to Aug 12, 2026 | 2.6% |
| Aug 12, 2026 to Sep 22, 2026 | 42.4% |
| Sep 22, 2026 to Nov 02, 2026 | 12.9% |
| Nov 02, 2026 to Dec 13, 2026 | 10.9% |
| Dec 13, 2026 to Jan 23, 2027 | 9.7% |
| After Jan 23, 2027 | 12.3% |
wooley_rhino • run 3afe934a • $1.58 • 6m5s
When will the Weekly Economic Index shift by more than 0.75 points from its current value?
Key figures
Historical context
The Weekly Economic Index (WEI) was developed by Lewis, Mertens, and Stock as a high-frequency measure to track U.S. economic activity in real-time. Historically, the index has shown high sensitivity to major macroeconomic shocks. For example, during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, the index recorded a massive weekly change of -2.74 points. Similarly, during the recovery phase in March 2021, it saw weekly increases as high as 2.76 points. However, outside of these extreme crisis periods, the index typically exhibits much smaller fluctuations. Over the period from 2007 to 2026, the mean value has been 1.98% with a range from -8.11% to 10.57%. In the 60 weeks leading up to July 2026, the index has been significantly more stable, operating within a tight band between 1.75% and 3.23%, with a standard deviation of approximately 0.29% to 0.32%. This recent period represents one of relative macroeconomic calm compared to the volatility of the early 2020s.
Tailwinds
Headwinds
Detailed reasoning
My analysis of the Weekly Economic Index (WEI) indicates a stable but moderately volatile environment, leading to a median prediction for a 0.75-point shift on 26th March 2028. The baseline value (X) at the time of the forecast was 2.50% (for the week ended June 20, 2026), establishing resolution thresholds of >3.25% or <1.75%.
In the immediate term, the probability of a breach is low. Historical data from the last 60 weeks shows the index has fluctuated between 1.75% and 3.23%. While the upper end of this range (3.23%) is extremely close to the 3.25% threshold, the index recently dropped to 2.50%, providing a buffer. Macrobond data reveals that moves exceeding ±0.75 points are statistically rare, occurring in less than 5% of the total historical sample since 2007. Furthermore, in the most recent 24-week window, the largest single-week move was only 0.60 points.
The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas publishes the WEI every Thursday. Because the resolution criteria specifically target the “first reported” value and ignore subsequent revisions, the event can only occur on these discrete publication dates. I have accounted for the semi-annual re-estimation of WEI weights that occurs every January and July. This methodology change can induce discrete level shifts even without significant changes in the underlying data, slightly elevating the risk of a breach during the July 2026 reporting cycle.
Macroeconomic drivers currently present a mixed signal. While Brent crude prices and inflation expectations suggest potential upward pressure (upside breach), recent cooling in oil prices to around $69 per barrel and a stable 12% recession probability for 2026 suggest the economy is not currently at a tipping point for a sharp downward break (<1.75%). The 13-week moving average sits at 2.83%, suggesting the index is currently operating in the upper half of its recent range.
Given the stability of the current regime and the rarity of large weekly swings, a breach is most likely to occur due to the cumulative effects of a business cycle shift (e.g., a transition toward recession or a significant growth acceleration) rather than an immediate shock. The median date of March 2028 reflects this long-term hazard, where the probability of the index eventually wandering outside its 1.5-point-wide band becomes more likely than not over a multi-year horizon.
Key uncertainties
Conclusion